Bored Now

I've had the first issue of Buffy Season 9 for two weeks now.  I live and die by Joss Whedon.  I love Buffy.  I love Buffy in comics even more.

I couldn't be moved to write anything about this issue.

Not that there is nothing to say.  There's actually quite a bit.  Buffy flirts or possibly flirts with everyone in the cast (more on this in a sec).  She has moved to San Fransisco to work in a coffee shop.  Her friends have moved with her.  She gets drunk and acts stupid at a party.

She never mentions Giles is dead. 

Very little seems to have changed for Buffy.  The character suffered a terrible loss and had her world utterly demolished at the end of season 8 - the climax of a story I still simply can't understand and no you can't make me even though you continue to try - yet Buffy the character remains firmly stuck in neutral.  The writing does too. 

The story repeats things we've seen before - think 'Anne,' think 'Doublemeat Palace.'  Buffy's life has gone to pot, and she takes up a real job in a different-ish environment while flexing considerable denial muscle.  Inevitably she is drawn back in to the world that refuses to let her go.  That clearly will happen again, even if that world is diminished.
What leaves me cold is despite the serious stakes - Buffy is now completely without any mentors, Willow is disturbingly blase after being divorced from magic and consequently her power, Xander is still Xander, except less and less all the time - the patterns remain the same.  Buffy will get the big picture, which will involve Willow, both textually and other-textually, though the writers can't seem to decide if the subtext is becoming the text.
At the beginning of this issue, Buffy wakes up after a night of serious drinking, naked in her bed.  Willow is mostly naked, in her bathroom.  Buffy questions if they had sex.  Willow teases her a little.  They share a - friendly? - kiss.  The Willow/Buffy dynamic has long been subtextual to the point of debate, but in Season 8, Buffy's experimentation sexually opened a door on the relationship that both probably thought didn't exist.  The scene at the beginning of the comic doesn't advance this.  It actually felt a little like Whedon was playing with the shippers, especially after he repeats similarly vague scenes with Buffy in regards to Xander and Spike. 
To me, the real dynamic is in how these characters grow.  Willow and Buffy in some ways are growing farther apart all the time, yet closer; they represent the heart now of the series, and different aspects of the feminine power that the series has always represented.  Power that is inherited, and power that is obtained.  Explorations of this power dynamic, and its impact on their relationship continue to be the draw for me.  So far, Season 9 isn't very magnetic.

I hope it will change.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mirror, Mirror

Image
Recently I bought a copy of a pretty well reviewed and promoted speculative fiction novel.  About two chapters in, the main character looks in a mirror and describes themself.  I literally closed the book and stopped reading.  The novel had other issues, but this put me right out of the story.  This technique - being generous here - occurs a lot in first person narratives, about as often as a story beginning with the main character waking up from a dream.  The mirror device is best avoided, but not necessarily because it's so overused - it's best avoided because simply put, it's so easy.  A character, especially a protagonist, should never be described; they should be imagined.
Read more

Conversations With: Dr. Daniel Dahlquist

Here's what I hope is the start of a new weekly (or so) feature on the blog: a mini-interview with writers about the craft. My good friend and teacher Dr. Daniel Dahlquist inaugurates the series. Dr. Dahlquist is a wonderful poet; his poetry has appeared in respected literary journals such as Prairie Schooner, New Virginia Review, River Styx, Kentucky Poetry Review, and the Louisville Review. He graduated from the University of Iowa's storied Writer's Workshop and holds a Ph.D. in Performance Studies from Southern Illinois University. His first book, SPEECH TO THE DEAD PEOPLE, was published in 1997 by Cedar Creek Press. You can read an excerpt from the book (and my favorite of his poems) here . Without further adieu: Q: What poets or other writers do you consider influences? A: The apocalyptic poets appealed to me when I was very young. I started writing poems at age sixteen, on my grandfather's 1928 L.C. Smith typewriter, largely to impress my English teacher.
Read more

My Advice For Writers

More and more I get asked for advice from aspiring writers. Mostly this is because I have a book, not because I really know anything. I'm not good at giving advice. Actually, I'm pretty good at it, just not very good at following it myself. So take all of this with a grain of salt. Actually, you should probably just click away to some other website right now. If you're still here, or have just reached the end of the internet, seriously: I've given a lot of thought to what I say to a serious writer who is asking me for serious perspective, and in so much as I can give it, I usually speak to these things: Find your faults . You have them. We all do. One thing my day job has taught me is to actively seek out process improvement. Usually we wait for problems to come to us - it's how we know they're problems - but most often in business, this can get you in trouble. The same applies to your art. It is a process; you should actively seek to impro
Read more