He's George W. Bush. Apparently. Andrew Kalvaan departs from his rocker in the Wall St. Journal in a suprisingly deluded way and I just have to put my two cents in.
The Dark Knight does not have a pro-Bush or pro-neo conservative stance. If you think it concerns the war on terror, and that is a legitimate argument, and if you think Batman=Bush, which is not legit, then here's why you cannot walk away from this film thinking it somehow legitimizes the last 7 years:
Batman fails to take the Joker seriously until it is too late.
Batman fails to kill the Joker when given the opportunity, and the justification to do so.
Batman 'extradites' a non-national from a foreign country where he has no jurisdiction.
Batman abuses his power and technology to spy on his own people.
Batman's actions only embolden his enemy.
You can find a correlative for everyone of those items in the last 7 years, and none of them are positive, and none of them presented that way in the film. The film ends with a adacious message - good men do the wrong thing for the right reason. Only in W's most fluffy fantasy land does he think this is what has happened in real life.