Buffy Season 9 #7, or How To Alienate Your Reader

For those of you keeping score at home, I've been on the fence with the latest comic book season of Buffy: The Vampire Slayer.  Unfortunately that's continued pretty much through the season so far, and continues with the latest issue, where Buffy plans to go through with the abortion of her unplanned pregnancy.

I have no issue with the subject itself, or Buffy contemplating what she contemplates; as I said in my last post on Buffy, I have issue with how the series is approaching it.  Joss Whedon and company approach the issue of Buffy getting drunk, pregnant and confused literally, which has never been the modus operandi of the series.  As I said before, typically Buffy has always presented common teenage/young adult fears via mystical/magical guises. The pregnancy does not seem right now to be anything than what it's presented to be, which is the result of a drunken one night stand.

I lamented the lack of subtext here, and maybe the writers anticipated that, because the very next issue puts such a twist on the subject as to give the reader whiplash. 

MAJOR SPOILERS FOLLOW




Ok.  So Buffy isn't Buffy.  She's the Buffy-Bot.  Yep.  It goes down like so:



I will give Joss Whedon the benefit of the doubt.  He will always have the benefit of the doubt.  But this presents nothing in the way of character or story development other than a cheap 'WTF' moment.  It also dodges what potentially was the most sober and mature storyline in the series.  So Buffy's not pregnant?  She's pregnant, but somewhere else?  She's trapped in the Buffy-Bot somehow?

Who cares?

It's a shock moment for the sake of a shock moment.  As a writer, you should avoid this at all costs.  Twists and turns, cliffhangers and surprises are some of the most enjoyable aspects of narrative, but not for their own sake.  I could be completely wrong (I hope I am) and this could be going somewhere, but anywhere it does diverts from the real issues at stake.  It feels like a tease, and frankly too much of this series has felt that way for a long time.

Any shocking development in your story needs to have value and it needs to be integral.  You know it when it's false; classic soap opera twists are lampooned for their cheapness ('You were my brother's sister's wife's girlfriend?') and you don't want your story going anywhere near such cliches.

Sigh.  Bored now.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mirror, Mirror

Image
Recently I bought a copy of a pretty well reviewed and promoted speculative fiction novel.  About two chapters in, the main character looks in a mirror and describes themself.  I literally closed the book and stopped reading.  The novel had other issues, but this put me right out of the story.  This technique - being generous here - occurs a lot in first person narratives, about as often as a story beginning with the main character waking up from a dream.  The mirror device is best avoided, but not necessarily because it's so overused - it's best avoided because simply put, it's so easy.  A character, especially a protagonist, should never be described; they should be imagined.
Read more

Conversations With: Dr. Daniel Dahlquist

Here's what I hope is the start of a new weekly (or so) feature on the blog: a mini-interview with writers about the craft. My good friend and teacher Dr. Daniel Dahlquist inaugurates the series. Dr. Dahlquist is a wonderful poet; his poetry has appeared in respected literary journals such as Prairie Schooner, New Virginia Review, River Styx, Kentucky Poetry Review, and the Louisville Review. He graduated from the University of Iowa's storied Writer's Workshop and holds a Ph.D. in Performance Studies from Southern Illinois University. His first book, SPEECH TO THE DEAD PEOPLE, was published in 1997 by Cedar Creek Press. You can read an excerpt from the book (and my favorite of his poems) here . Without further adieu: Q: What poets or other writers do you consider influences? A: The apocalyptic poets appealed to me when I was very young. I started writing poems at age sixteen, on my grandfather's 1928 L.C. Smith typewriter, largely to impress my English teacher.
Read more

My Advice For Writers

More and more I get asked for advice from aspiring writers. Mostly this is because I have a book, not because I really know anything. I'm not good at giving advice. Actually, I'm pretty good at it, just not very good at following it myself. So take all of this with a grain of salt. Actually, you should probably just click away to some other website right now. If you're still here, or have just reached the end of the internet, seriously: I've given a lot of thought to what I say to a serious writer who is asking me for serious perspective, and in so much as I can give it, I usually speak to these things: Find your faults . You have them. We all do. One thing my day job has taught me is to actively seek out process improvement. Usually we wait for problems to come to us - it's how we know they're problems - but most often in business, this can get you in trouble. The same applies to your art. It is a process; you should actively seek to impro
Read more